The use of information and disinformation is ultimate power. This is the doctrine of Black Ops, i.e., counter intelligence or black propaganda. War waged by governments against the people in the creation of a Machiavellian-Orwellian super state, where the serfs are manipulated and controlled.
"Everything that seems clear is bent; everything that seems bent is clear. In your reflection, you must learn to recognize a lie masquerading as the truth."
The events of September 11, 2001 will live in infamy. But this particular Month and Day are not without other significance throughout our history.
On September 11, 1990, exactly 11 years to the day that Flight 11 flew into one of the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, George H. W. Bush delivered this peculiar address before Congress on the eve of the first Gulf War:
"A new partnership of nations has begun, and we stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward a historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective-- a new world order-- can emerge: A new era-- freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmony."
"A hundred generations have searched for the elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars waged across the span of human endeavor, and today that new world is struggling to be born. A world quite different from the one we've known. A world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle. A world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice. A world where the strong recognize the rights of the week."
Coincidence? I think not, especially when one understands that the powers pushing this New World Order seem to be followers of secret and ancient mystery schools (Egyptian, Babylonian,etc.), of which, the numerology of Pythagoras is of major importance. The fact remains that certain numbers (eleven) and certain dates (9-11) have special significance to these people.
What appear to be the ramblings of a madman above, actually have a long historical tradition that can be traced back to the Bavarian Illuminati, freemasonry, and their myriad of offshoots (Skull and Bones, Knights of Malta, Nazis, Communists, etc.). This phrase ('New World Order') which can be found on our dollar bill in Latin, bares huge similarities to the language used by the Nazis and their 'Third Reich' (Bush's 'fifth objective'), and the 'Communist Revolution' rhetoric of the early 20th Century.
That there is such a thing as a cabal of power brokers that control world events from behind the scenes has been detailed several times this century by credible sources. Professor Caroll Quigley was Bill Clinton's mentor at Georgetown University. President Clinton has publicly paid homage to the influence Professor Quigley had on his life. In Quigley's magnum opus Tragedy and Hope (1966), he states:
"There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international network which operates to some extent, in the way that the radical right believes that Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years, and was permitted for two years, in the early 60's, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it, or most of its aims, and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies... but in general my chief difference in opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe that its role in history is significant enough to be known."
And so we come to the crux of this website, which is that September 11, 2001 was not the effect of radical Muslim terrorists, as the black operators in our news media are trying to fool us into thinking, but it is the direct result of powerful elements within our very own government, who have sought the profits of oil, blood, and war.
The evidence is clear enough for even the blind to see.. A 110 story steel structure does not collapse at nearly free fall rate of speed unless its steel core and support columns are blown out from top to bottom, as you would see during a controlled demolition. Steel beams do not liquefy by gasoline fire. 110 story steel structures, built to withstand hurricane force winds, do not collapse due to the impact of a thin-metal aluminum-passenger airliner. Two 110 story steel structures do not collapse, almost simultaneously, due to gasoline fire, when no single structure has ever done so in the history of architecture. Something just doesn't add up with the official story being force-fed us by our government-controlled-corporate- propaganda media outlets.
(A picture of ground zero after 911) The above picture is smoking-gun evidence of a 9-11 cover up. Something that could only have been created by a shaped charge used in controlled demolitions, not only cut through giant steel beams, but melted it at very precise lines and angles. Since iron melts at much higher temperatures than can be produced by a mere gasoline fire, what could have caused these definitive markings? One thing is for certain, these markings were not created by passenger airliners. There's only one way that this could have happened folks: controlled demolition!
In the picture to the left, a professional demolitionist demonstrates how a shaped charge is placed. Notice the angle at which the charge is positioned in this picture and then note the picture above of ground zero and the precise angle at which the above-pictured iron beam was cut. This is classic controlled demolition, as this professional demonstrates to the left.
Here we have more steel beams from ground zero with the classic V-cut demolition markings. Yes, we should save these!
What kind of force could have bent an 8-ton H beam like this? One thing is for certain, it's not from a thin-metal jet airliner striking it. These beams were built to withstand everything that nature could send at them.
The cores of the Twin Towers have been described as an industructable mesh of massive steel beams. No explanation has ever been offered by the government and its news media as to how both of these cores could have collapsed so easily on that day. If you look closely at the footage of the collapse of the the South Tower, you will notice that the t.v. antenna, which sits directly apon the steel core of the structure, falls before anything else does. The only way that this could happen is if the core was blown out.
Above is a picture of the World Trade Center core under construction. What could have brought such a massive steel structure down? Certainly, not an aluminum airliner and some jet fuel (iron melts at much higher temperatures than a hydrocarbon-based fire will allow.)
What could have reduced the above-pictured steel structure to this, but a controlled demolition?
Several witnesses claim that they heard explosives within the Towers just before and during the collapse. Many of these witnesses were actually in the basements of the Towers when large explosions shattered glass and knocked plaster and tiling off of the ceiling and walls several minutes before the collapse. This is classic demolitions, where the basement is blown first, while the the building is cracked from top to bottom and brought down within its own footprint, i.e., basement.
- Van Romero, Vice President For Research At New Mexico Institute Of Mining And Technology
"I spoke with some police officials moments ago ... and they told me they have reason to believe that one of the explosions at the World Trade Center may have been caused by a van that was parked in the building that may have had some type of explosive device in it." - Rick Sanchez, MSNBC - 9/11/2001 "Apparently what appears to happen, that at the same time two planes hit the buildings, that the FBI most likely thinks that there was a car or truck packed with explosives underneath the buildings which also exploded at the same time and brought both of them down."
"Just moments ago I spoke to the chief of safety for the New York City fire department, he received word of the possibility of a secondary device - that is another bomb going off ... according to his theory he thinks that there were actually devices that were planted in the building." - Pat Dawson, MSNBC - 9/11/2001
“It was like a professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."- NYC Paramedic Daniel Rivera"It was as if as if they had detonated ... as if they had planned to take down a building, boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom "- NYFD Captain Dennis Tardio
"It almost sounded like bombs going off, like boom, boom, boom, like seven or eight"- NYFD Firefighter Thomas Turilli"Heard explosions coming from . . . the south tower . . . There were about ten explosions. . . . We then realized the building started to come down" - NYFD Firefighter Craig Carlsen"It actually gave at a lower floor, not the floor where the plane hit. . . . We originally had thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came down"- NYFD Firefighter Edward Cachia"Somewhere around the middle . . . there was this orange and red flash coming out. Initially it was just one flash. Then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode ... With each popping sound it was initially an orange and then a red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides as far as I could see. These popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger, going both up and down and then all around the building"- NYFD Captain Karin Deshore"A debate began to rage because . . . many people had felt that possibly explosives had taken out 2 World Trade"
- NYFD Firefighter Christopher Fenyo
This cannot be caused by Jet fuel. A military explosive known as thermite is capable of producing this effect. Evidence of this was found at Ground Zero, as well as white smoke indicative of Aluminum Oxide, a byproduct of a thermite/iron reaction.
construction-grade steel (and I think we can all agree that the WTC engineers would have used only the highest grade steel possible) melts at 2795 degrees Fahrenheit. Meanwhile, according to a BBC report on September 13, 2001 entitled How the World Trade Center Fell, the WTC steel cores reached a temperature of 1472 degrees (that's when the jet fuel was burning at its hottest just after impact) Fahrenheit, which, coincidentally, is the maximum temperature of jet fuel outside of a controlled burn, but nowhere near the 2795 degrees needed to melt steel.
Certain facts that should be understood about fire. Different types of fire (hydrocarbon) produce different colors and types of smoke. A karosene-based fire (jet fuel) will produce mostly black smoke, especially when it is going out, as we saw billowing out of the burning Twin Towers on 9-11 just after the planes had hit. This indicates that the initial fires created by the ignited jet fuel were not hot enough to melt steel. A thermite/iron reaction produces white powdery smoke and white-hot molten iron. If we find these effects in the Twin Towers on 9-11, it was not produced by jet fuel.
We have the NIST report, which has been bandied by the "official story" progenators as the gospel of 9-11, but the holes in this report are legion.
"Her complaint, technically, Request for Correction, like the others, asserts that the basic integrity of NIST's report, called NCSTAR 1, is lacking because, by its own admission, NIST did not investigate the actual destruction of the World Trade Center Towers: "The focus of the investigation was on the sequence of events from the instance of aircraft impact to the initiation of collapse for each tower." This means that the NIST report does not actually include the collapse behavior of the towers after the conditions for their initiation were realized, which NIST refers to as "the probable collapse sequence."
"NIST, of course, claims that it was the impact of the aircraft and the jet-fuel based fires, which caused the steel to weaken and bring about a collapse," Fetzer said. "But the buildings were designed to withstand such occurrences and the steel had been certified by UL to 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit for several hours without weakening. The fires only burned around 500 degrees for less than an hour (in the case of WTC-2) and an hour-and-a-half (in the case of WTC-2), so NIST really doesn't even reach the point at which a 'collapse' of any kind would be 'initiated.' The situation is quite remarkable."Source
The National Institute of Standards and Technology was created and funded by Congress.
According to a FEMA report, sulfur was found at ground zero. The New York Times called this "the greatest mystery of all." Sulfur lowers the melting point of iron. Sulfur combinded with thermite is called thermate, and it is used to speed up the demolition of steel structures.
BYU physics professor Steven Jones went on a speaking circuit, discussing the evidence that he had uncovered of thermite being used in WTC demolitions. Here he provides video evidence of thermite at 9-11 during one of his speaking engagements.
WTC Building 7 was the third steel structure to collapse due to fire in the history of skyscrapers. The other two steel structures were Towers One and Two of the WTC Complex. As unusual as this is, what is even stranger is that surrounding buildings that were far closer to Towers One and Two than building 7 recieved very minor damage, and of course, did not collapse nor were they demolished after the fact. It has still yet to be explained how Building 7 ever caught on fire (the deisel fuel in the basement excuse just doesn't fly,) given the fact that it was a block away from Towers One and Two. The only explanation seems to be that it was insured a few months beforehand by Larry Silverstein, along with all of the other buildings that were demolished, or mysteriously collapsed on that day.
Also, consider that Building 7 housed the cities emergency command center, the CIA, IRS, Secret Service, Fema, FBI and the SEC. "One of the most interesting tenants was then-Mayor Giuliani's Office of Emergency Management, and its emergency command center on the 23rd floor. This floor received 15 million dollars worth of renovations, including independent and secure air and water supplies, and bullet and bomb resistant windows designed to withstand 200 MPH winds. The 1993 bombing must have been part of the rationale for the command center, which overlooked the Twin Towers, a prime terrorist target.
How curious that on the day of the attack, Guiliani and his entourage set up shop in a different headquarters, abandoning the special bunker designed precisely for such an event."1 Could the demolition of this structure be an attempt at destroying operational evidence of this crime?
Watch this gif of WTC7, and judge for yourself whether it was a controlled demolition.
It was explained by our government that fire brought down WTC Building 7, yet fire has never brought down a steel skyscraper in the history of architecture. What can be seen in the picture above is Building 7 of the World Trade Center Complex in the midst of its collapse on September 11, 2001. Notice the obvious crimp at the top of the collapse, indicative of a controlled demolition, where the center column is pulled first.
The collapse of WTC Building 7 was predicted several times before its imminent and unprecedented collapse. Eye-witness reports show that officials who controlled the streets around WTC 7 evacuated the area in the hour before the 5:20 PM collapse, and that various officials forwarded verbal warnings conveying certainty that the collapse would occur. Network television broadcasts contain announcements of the collapse at least 23 minutes before the event. How is this possible, when nothing like it had ever occurred before? This foreknowledge proves complicity.
"We were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was gonna collapse," Rudolph Giuliani told Peter Jennings of ABC News that morning, "and it did collapse before we could get out of the building."
Despite this, Giuliani fled WTC 7 at least eight hours before it collapsed. How did he know that the twin towers were going to collapse if it was such an unprecedented occurance? Why didn't the firefighters on the ground get the same warning?
Here we have a BBC reporter telling us that Building 7 has collapsed, even though it hadn't yet?
CNN reporter predicts the collapse an hour before it happens.
Then we have Larry Silverstein, owner of the Complex, discussing how he ordered Building 7 to be pulled (industry lingo for controlled demolition.)
Giuliani was awarded the title Knight Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire by Queen Elizabeth II on October of 2001 (which country is he serving?). He was also named one of People Magazine's "25 Most Intriguing People of the Year 2001", Time Magazine's "Person of the Year 2001", and A&E's "Biography of the Year in 2001." Suffice it to say, he was paid well for his role in 9-11.
Nonetheless, his story just doesn't check out. In fact, his story has changed at least five times, as to where he was and what he was doing on that day. We know that he seemed to have foreknowledge as to the unprecedented collapse of Building 7, and we also know that he was evacuated from the World Trade Center Complex when none of the police and firefighters were given the same timely warnings, but what else did he do on and immediately after that day?
"Giuliani's cult hero status went untarnished and unchallenged until he decided to decline an invitation to the International Association for Firefighters Forum, open to all Presidential candidates for Q & A. Mainstream news then picked up on the story and exposed the contention between the former Mayor and the real heroes, the New York Firefighters who lost so many of their friends and compatriots in the attacks of that day. All was not well in Oz and finally someone had alluded to the mask shadowing the truth - a great rift exists between Giuliani and the one group America assumes to be his staunchest allies." source
Here we have part of the response to Giuliani's decline of an invitation to speak to the Real Heros of 9-11:
" The IAFF recognizes that Mayor Giuliani generally enjoys a favorable reputation as a result of his actions immediately after the tragedy of 9/11. Many people consider Rudy Giuliani "America's Mayor," and many of our members who don't yet know the real story, may also have a positive view of him. This letter is intended to make all of our members aware of the egregious acts Mayor Giuliani committed against our members, our fallen on 9/11, and our New York City union officers following that horrific day. Rest assured, our exclusion of Mayor Giuliani is not about any particular contractual or policy issue or disagreement. His actions post 9/11 rise to such an offensive and personal attack on our brother and sisterhood - and directly on our union - that the IAFF does not feel Rudy Giuliani deserves an audience of IAFF leaders and members at our own Presidential Forum. The disrespect that he exhibited to our 343 fallen FDNY brothers, their families and our New York City IAFF leadership in the wake of that tragic day has not been forgiven or forgotten."
Bill Manning, editor of Fire Engineering, a 125-year-old-monthly firefighting trade magazine with ties to the New York City Fire Department, wrote in an editor's opinion piece in the January 2002 issue called "$elling Out the Investigation", "Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the 'official investigation' blessed by FEMA and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is a half-baked farce that may already have been commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full disclosure."
If the official government story is correct, then the remains should have at least been allowed for study by structural engineers from across the nation in order to determine the cause of such a catastrophic failure. Not only this, but they lost money by shipping it overseas, when there were American companies right here that could have done the job for more money minus shipping costs. The only way that this makes sense is if it were a cover-up. Coincidentally, the same company that did the clean-up after 9-11 was the same company that cleaned up the debris at the Oklahoma City bomb site.
Do you know how many souls were lost during the September 11, 2001 terror attacks? As of June 4, 2004 the official count was 2,973 people died. The American people rallied around their government and cried for justice.
“I can hear you, the rest of the world can hear you and the people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon.” George W. Bush
“Every nation in every region now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.” George W. Bush
Every American knew we were on the eve of WAR. According to Fox news the Presidents approval rating on September 19,2001 “soared to 81% from 55%.” Now Bush had the “blank check” to escalate the new “WAR ON TERROR.”
The position of 911BLACK OPS is to show proof of a sinister force behind 911, not excluding the American Government. The American Government knew of the plot, and needed another PEARL HARBOR for their MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX!
What The World Had To Say
"I know many qualified engineers and scientists have said the WTC collapsed from explosives. In fact, if you look at the manner in which it fell, you have to give their conclusions credibility."- Paul Craig Roberts, Former Assistant Secretary of Treasury under Reagan
"What I saw on September 11 was a perfectly executed act that could have happened only with the support of intelligence services."-Andreas Von Buelow, former German Secretary of Defense
"Generally it is impossible to carry out an act of terror on the scenario which was used in the USA yesterday...As soon as something like that happens here, I am reported about that right away and in a minute we are all up."- General Anatoly Kornukov, Commander in Chief of the Russian Air Force
"...when the news came out I had to wonder. Why did airplanes fly around for an hour and a half without interceptors being scrambled from Andrews? Why did the President just sit in the schoolroom when he heard the news?"- Paul Hellyer, former Canadian Minister of National Defense
"We simply cannot ignore the fact that elements of the US government at the highest levels may have committed treason and mass murder by purposely allowing 9/11 to happen."- Dr. Robert Bowman, United States Air Force (Retired), Archbishop, United Catholic Church"This is more than a war against terrorism. This is a war against the citizens of all countries. The current elites are creating so much fear that people don't know how to respond. But they must remember. This is a move to implement a world dictatorship within the next five years."- Dr. Johannes Koeppl, a former German Defense Ministry official and NATO advisor
"This war on terrorism is bogus: The 9/11 attacks gave the US an ideal pretext to use force to secure its global domination"
- Michael Meacher, British MP, Environmental Minister from May 1997 to June 2003
"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.”
"We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together."
According to the traditional adage, when a crime is committed, the first question to be asked is "Cui bono?" — "Who benefits?" Did the 911 highjackers benefit (they were told they would become Martyrs sent to heavan and have sex with dozens of virgins)? Did the Taliban benefit(they are out of power)? Did Saddam Hussein benefit(I don‘t believe he wanted to die)? Don’t misconstrue, Saddam, the Taliban, and the 19 high jackers are evil, and there should be no empathy for the actions of these men. However, we should all be searching for the truth, and the old adage “The Truth Shall Set You Free” is the doctrine of Patriots.
"I cannot accept, your canon that
we are to judge pope and king unlike other men,
with a favorable presumption that they do no wrong.
If there is any presumption, it is the other way against holders of power ...
Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."Lord Acton, to the bishop of London, 1887
After the Cold War the United States saw the largest peace time expansion in history. Consider who worked for companies relating to the MILITARY-INDUSTIRAL COMPLEX during the 1990’s that have a direct correlation with the Bush administration:
Department of Defense, Inc.
It is not just industry-backed think tanks that have infiltrated the administration. Former executives, consultants or shareholders of top U.S. defense companies pervade the Bush national security team.Lockheed Martin, the nation's largest defense contractor, has more connections to the Bush administration than any other major defense contractor -- eight current policy makers had direct or indirect ties to the company before joining the administration. Lynne Cheney, wife of Vice President Dick Cheney, served on Lockheed's board of directors from 1994 until January 2001, accumulating more than $500,000 in deferred director's fees in the process. Former Lockheed Chief Operating Officer Peter Teets is now Undersecretary of the Air Force and Director of the National Reconnaissance Office, a post that includes making decisions on the acquisition of everything from reconnaissance satellites to space-based elements of missile defense.
September 19, 2003: FBI Finds No Insider Trading
Spokesperson Paul Bresson announces that the FBI has concluded that there was no insider trading in US securities markets by people with advance knowledge of the 9/11 attacks. According to Bresson, the “vast majority” of a pre-attack surge of trading in options that bet on a drop in the stock of AMR Corp., which owns American Airlines, and UAL Corp., which owns United Airlines, was conducted by investment hedge funds implementing bearish investment strategies or hedging a line position of common stock and was not linked to terrorists. [St. Petersburg Times, 9/19/2003; Washington Post, 9/19/2003] Independent research will indicate otherwise a few months later.
In a footnote contained in its Final Report, the 9/11 Commission dismissed allegations of insider trading in the days preceding 9/11. According to the Final Report, the put options of the parent companies of United Airlines were placed by a “US-based institutional investor with no conceivable ties to al-Qaeda” “as part of a trading strategy that also included buying 115,000 shares of American on September 10.” With respect to the highly suspicious trading on the parent company of American Airlines, the Commission stated that much of the trades were “traced to a specific US-based options trading newsletter, faxed to its subscribers on Sunday, September 9, which recommended these trades.” According to the Commission, “The SEC and the FBI, aided by other agencies and the securities industry, devoted enormous resources to investigating this issue, including securing the cooperation of many foreign governments. These investigators have found that the apparently suspicious consistently proved innocuous.” [9/11 Commission, 7/24/2004, pp. 499]
will_koch_sooner@yahoo.com
"The essential act of war is destruction, not necessarily of human lives, but of the products of human labour. War is a way of shattering to pieces, or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea, materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable, and hence, in the long run, too intelligent. Even when weapons of war are not actually destroyed, their manufacture is still a convenient way of expending labour power without producing anything that can be consumed. A Floating Fortress, for example, has locked up in it the labour that would build several hundred cargo-ships. Ultimately it is scrapped as obsolete, never having brought any material benefit to anybody, and with further enormous labours another Floating Fortress is built. In principle the war effort is always so planned as to eat up any surplus that might exist after meeting the bare needs of the population. In practice the needs of the population are always underestimated, with the result that there is a chronic shortage of half the necessities of life ; but this is looked on as an advantage. It is deliberate policy to keep even the favoured groups somewhere near the brink of hardship, because a general state of scarcity increases the importance of small privileges and thus magnifies the distinction between one group and another. By the standards of the early twentieth century, even a member of the Inner Party lives an austere, laborious kind of life. Nevertheless, the few luxuries that he does enjoy his large, well-appointed flat, the better texture of his clothes, the better quality of his food and drink and tobacco, his two or three servants, his private motor-car or helicopter - set him in a different world from a member of the Outer Party, and the members of the Outer Party have a similar advantage in comparison with the submerged masses whom we call " the proles ". The social atmosphere is that of a besieged city, where the possession of a lump of horseflesh makes the difference between wealth and poverty. And at the same time the consciousness of being at war, and therefore in danger, makes the handing-over of all power to a small caste seem the natural, unavoidable condition of survival."
GEORGE ORWELL: 1984
Lone Firefighter Stands In The Rubble At Ground Zero. Firefighters Blast Giuliani full story...
Iraq war veteran and experienced demolitions expert blows the cover on 9/11 inside job full story...
Hellerstein cancels FBI, CIA, counter-terror chiefs’ testimony, asserts bias against punitive damages despite foreign conflicts
full story...
Congress continues to ignore explosive memos pointing to secret cash payoffs full story...
WIDOW BATTLING FOR 9/11 TRUTH DESPERATELY NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!
full story...
Ground Zero Building Catches Fire, Doesn't Collapse full story...
Airlines, Others Sue FBI, CIA To Depose Agents In 9-11 Cases full story...
History Channel Hit Piece: Dirty Tricks, Malicious Lies & Journalistic Fraud full story...
About Us | Site
Map | Contact Us | ©2007 911 Black Ops
